New to the forum? Sign Up Here! Already a member? Please login below.
|
|||||
|
||
|
I seriously doubt that a tubal reversal will provide results you seek, if IVF did not. |
||
|
||
|
Why do you say that? Please elaborate... |
||
|
||
|
If you did not respnd well to an IVF stimulation, you probably have poor ovarian function, even at your young age. You will almost certainly require aggressive stimulation with FSH products. You may as well do IVF as opposed to hoping for a single egg, if you ovulate, on your own at all. Also, if you have a tubal reversal, since your tubes will have been operated twice, they are damaged. You will be at greater risk for tubal pregancy. |
||
|
||
|
So... since I had a failed cycle, a cancelled cycle, FSH 11.9 (one time), and a antral follicle count of eight that means that a reversal has poor chances of working? I am aware that there are an increased incidence of tubal pregnancies. The increase incidence does not seem to be cause to not to proceed with a reversal in amny instances. I just cannot see spending tens of thousands of dollars on IVF that has proven to be unsuccessful thus far. Is it incorrect that the success of reversals is 60-80%? |
||
|
||
|
Success rate of tubal reversal is dependent on the surgeon. I tis difficult to apply statistics from multiple sources and apply them to individuals. I must repeat, if you are not reliably producing eggs, you are unlikely to become pregnant, even if your tubes are open. |
||
|
||
|
So, How do I find out if I am reliably producing eggs? |
||
|
||
|
There are only 2 ways to KNOW you have ovulated. One is to observe follicl rupture with serial ultrasound exsaminations. The other, at the risk of sounding flippant, is to become pregnant. The fact that you have had a poor response, twice, to efforts at IVF stimulation implis your ovaries are not functioning normally. |
||