|
Although the E2 is on the low side, there is only a moderate correlation between E2 and egg quality. The low E2 was probably caused by the prolonged suppression, but the follicles that did begin growing have grown in diameter faster than their capacity to produce E2. There appears to be some dysynchony here. It is a tough call - depend on the E2 and push the stim another day? or go with follicle size and trigger after 7 days of stim? I don't really have answer for you. It really about choosing the lesser of two evils. DAmned if you do, damned if you don't. And of course, hindsight will be 20/20.
Prolonged suppression can result in slightly fewer follicles developing on that cycle, but the main effect is seen in E2 production and the rate of follicular growth.
You are correct that the over production of E2 is associated with poor egg quality, but not as a direct cause and effect. I am not really sure about the effect of low E2, but when there is dysynchony between E2 production and follicular growth, its not a good sign. I wouldn't have high expectations for this cycle. I would recommend ICSI (even in the absence of a male factor) to facilitate fertilization in this case. I hope this advice gets to you in time. Best of luck.
Reply
|