|
Dr. Smith,
Thanks SO VERY MUCH for your reply.
Here's the issue with the donor sperm. Because my ethnicity and other characteristics are very hard to match whereas my husband's are relatively easy to match, we decided to try to find a sperm donor whose characteristics are like mine and an egg donor whose characteristics are like his. And even though it's so much easier to find sperm donors than egg donors, it was still a struggle to find a sperm donor. (When I went shopping for donors, Fairfax Cryobank had none that matched my ethnicity. California Cryobank had about half a dozen, but since I'm IgG and IgM negative, my options were more limited. The trait I am most concerned, after ethnicity, to have a donor match is my intelligence and curiosity. But this makes things difficult since I test in the 99th percentile for quantitative and analytical abilities. I'm saying this only to give you a sense of the odds of my finding an appropriate donor.) Anyway, nearly miraculously I did find an appropriate sperm donor. Unfortunately there were only three vials of semen left. I bought them all, but now one of them has been wasted on this past cycle.
I continue to look for appropriate sperm donors, but so far, no luck. So it makes me very, very nervous to be down to only two vials. I thought about refreezing because it seems to me that since ICSI requires only one sperm per egg, even if very few sperm made it, there would still be enough. (Out of 5 million, we'd need only 0.0003 PERCENT to survive!) Is there something wrong with my thought here? Is it likely that a sperm that survived two freezes and two thaws would be less able to produce a pregnancy than a sperm that survived just one freeze and thaw?
Thanks so much for the possible explanation for the terrible results of this cycle. I will ask my clinic about the possibility of testing the donor's HCG level the day after the shot. It sounds like an utterly reasonable thing to do.
I guess you didn't read my earlier post, but one of my questions had to do with what it is reasonable for me to expect my clinic to do financially in a case like this. (Do you work in the embryology lab or in accounts payable?! I know the answer, but I didn't know anyone else who'd be more apt to know the answer than you.) The cycle started out as a shared recipient cycle at $12K each, then since the donor did not produce 10 mature eggs, it went to a single recipient cycle for which I would be charged another $7K. I'm happy to report that my clinic is not charging me the additional $7K; MOREOVER they are in essence refunding my $12K (they'll actually hold that money, but then not charge me for the next cycle). This brings me though to a question. Most of the donor cycles at my clinic are done as shared cycles. And my clinic has, for donor cycles, a liveborn rate of 53%-64% per transfer, according to the recent CDC reports. Would one expect single-recipient cycles to do much better? My clinic says that they don't see a difference, but I think they don't do enough single recipient cycles for that to be meaningful. Can you give me information that might help me calculate the odds myself? I ask because I feel that I have only two more chances, given that the supply of sperm is just two vials.
Thanks again. Your generosity with your time and knowledge are truly remarkable and very much appreciated.
Reply
|