|
|||
| Dr Smith - Nov 15th, 2005 6:15 PM | |
|
There is a chance. Hang in there. Although the value is not doubling every two days as expected, it may still be O.K. If it starts to decline or plateau, then you are in trouble. Best of luck. | |
| laura - Nov 16th, 2005 11:22 AM | |
|
Dear Dr. Smith, | |
| Dr Smith - Nov 16th, 2005 1:29 PM | |
|
Hang in there until the numbers start to go down or plateau. Until then, nobody really knows. Sorry. I'm sure you're going crazy not knowing what's going on. | |
| dawn1121 - Nov 29th, 2005 2:44 PM | |
|
Laura, | |
| laura-1 - Nov 29th, 2005 3:20 PM | |
|
Hi Dawn, | |
| dawn1121 - Nov 30th, 2005 7:42 PM | |
|
Laura, | |
| laura - Dec 1st, 2005 10:15 AM | |
|
Hi Dawm, | |
| dawn1121 - Dec 5th, 2005 7:24 PM | |
|
Laura, | |
| sue - Mar 31st, 2006 8:22 AM | |
|
HI, I am new I had my first IVF transfer on March 12. | |
| Dr Smith - Mar 31st, 2006 9:20 AM | |
|
You hCG values started off on the low side, but they are doubling every two days as expected. At this point, it is impossible to predict if this will be a successful term pregnancy. I imagine that your doctor will continue to monitor the hCG and perform an ultrasound if the hCG continues to rise appropriately. Cautious optimism is in order. Good luck. | |
| firsttimerinpanic - Apr 16th, 2006 8:21 PM | |
|
I had my first HCG Score, 229 - the doctor said it was high for one but not so high twins were a sure thing. Two days later I had my second HCG Score, 270. The doctor said it could be that a twin is dying off or that it could be a tubal pregnancy. I am supposed to go in again in 2 days. Can someone be low rising and then show an increase? How can they determine which thing is occuring to me? Is there anything you can personally do to impact you HCG increase rate? | |
| Dr Smith - Apr 18th, 2006 11:38 AM | |
|
Unfortunately you will just have to wait it out. The "vanishing twin" is fairly common and that seems the most likely explanation for the attenuated rise in the hCG. If this is the case, your hCG will rise appropriately from now on. Your doctor will be able to determine a tubal pregnancy if your hCG continues to rise (not necessarily appropriately), but a gestational sac is not visible in the uterus by ultrasound at 3-4 weeks after the positive hCG test. | |
| peachfzz78 - Apr 22nd, 2006 12:13 PM | |
|
Hi. I had 2 successful pregnancies, then I lost one at 11 weeks last July. We have been trying ever since, and were unsuccessful. So were were about to go for fertility treatments when we found out we were indeed pregnant. However, I had light brown spotting.I had the HCG tests done at 5 weeks pregnant on 4/17 and it was 3200 and again on 4/19 and it was 5500. It didnt double so what does that mean for me? I had slight light pink discharge today. I go for an early ultrasound this coming week to see the babies development, if any.Its so devastating to lose a child, especially when you know you can have children. Has anyone had this happen, where your levels do not double as they should, but they do go up? Help!!! | |
| Dr Smith - Apr 25th, 2006 5:12 PM | |
|
The doubling guideline only applies to the very early hCG values. You were farther along in your pregnancy when you got the pregnancy test, so the doubling guideline may not apply. The discharges/spotting are within the norm for early pregnancy. Another cause of a slowing in the rate of rise on the hCG is the "vanishing twin". Initially a twin pregnancy is established, but one of the twins fails to develop and release the hCG hormone. There can be dip in the hCG values and then they pick up again. The ultrasound will tell more about what is happening. | |
| peachfzz78 - Apr 26th, 2006 3:49 PM | |
|
Hi Doctor Smith. Im not sure if you were responding to my post, but i am the one who was asking about the HCG numbers doubling. You say it refers to early on in the pregnancy. Well how early? I am only 6 weeks and was only 5 weeks when I got the HCG tests done. Also, is there a chance my Progesterone is low and should have that tested? I have heard many women have to take Progesterone early in pregnancy when spotting to reduce risk of miscarriage. Thanks. | |
| Dr Smith - Apr 27th, 2006 11:05 AM | |
|
I answered your other post. | |
| peachfzz78 - Apr 28th, 2006 8:01 AM | |
|
I know that doctor. But i had other questions that is why i posted the 2nd one. | |
| Dr Smith - Apr 28th, 2006 11:25 AM | |
|
Yes, very low progesterone can be a problem in early pregnancy, but if it wasn't measured, there's no way to know. If it was measured, and it was below 9 ng/ml, then it may be contributing to the problem. I still think it "vanishing twin" (which is more common than low progesterone). | |
| Marianne - Apr 28th, 2006 6:47 PM | |
|
My hcg level (after ivf) is 7.8. This is 12 days post transfer. They said it should be at least 50, but usually over 100. My dr. said stop progesterone, I should get my period in a few days. I feel like he is giving up. Is there hope? | |
| Dr Smith - May 2nd, 2006 9:39 AM | |
|
You had a "chemical" pregnancy. The embryo implanted, but failed to develop. This is usually due to a genetic problem with the embryo. An alternative explanation is that your body rejected the developing embryo (i.e. an autoimmune problem). Discuss these posibilities with your doctor in your follow up. | |
| Dr Smith - May 3rd, 2006 11:40 AM | |
|
Sorry to be Dr Doom 'n' Gloom, but I think there is no hope in your case. The low hCG is indicative of a "chemical" pregnancy. The embryo attached to the endometrium and initiated implantation, but then failed to develop further. This is usually due to abnormalities in the genetics of the embryo (see previous post). It is a frequent occurrence for both fertile and infertile women. It is nature's way of preventing abnormal pregnancies from continuing to term. | |
| baihu - May 3rd, 2006 12:47 PM | |
|
Dr. Smith, Thanks so much for your posting. | |
| Dr Smith - May 4th, 2006 11:14 AM | |
|
At 41, approximately 80-90% of your eggs are genetically abnormal. In order to have a reasonable chance of success, you would have to produce around 10 eggs on an IVF cycle (about 12 mature follicles developing at the time of retrieval) on your next cycle. Your last cycle would indicate that this is unlikely. | |
| baihu - May 4th, 2006 2:02 PM | |
|
Dr. Smith, Thanks so much for the information... | |
| Dr Smith - May 4th, 2006 3:30 PM | |
|
These are medical questions and outside my area of expertise. Usually, its prudent to follow your doctor's instructions in these matters. | |
| AmyR - Jun 13th, 2006 12:44 PM | |
|
Hi there I am in the same boat and need some advice. I had an IVF ET and at 11DPT my HCG was 23, today 15DPT it was only 42... it's not looking good and I am so dissappointed. They want me to go back on the 19th of the month for another HCG... do I have any hope??? Amy | |
| AmyR - Jun 13th, 2006 4:40 PM | |
|
Thanks for the info I will let you know how it turns out.. Amy | |
| AmyR - Jun 20th, 2006 12:37 PM | |
|
well my numbers went down to 21 so after AF I am on to FET. Any ideas on this, I have 14 frozen embryos! What are the success rates fresh vs. frozen? Medicated or not? Thanks Amy | |
| Dr Smith - Jun 22nd, 2006 9:07 AM | |
|
In general, the pregnancy rates for medicated and unmediated cycles is the same. However, medicated cycles make things much more predictable for the patient, physicans and the lab. | |
| honeybaby - Jun 28th, 2006 4:04 PM | |
|
Hello Dr. Smith, | |
| Dr Smith - Jun 29th, 2006 7:41 AM | |
|
Nothing necessarily went "wrong", but I would suspect embryo quality (e.g. abnormal genetics). It is impossible to say for sure, but abnormal blastocyst stage embryos having very few stem cells produce "chemical" pregnancies such as yours. Chemical pregnancies are common, even amongst the "fertile" population. It is nature's way of terminating the abnormal pregnancy as early as possible, so that you can try again on the next cycle. It is natural to search for answers following a chemical pregnancy, but it may be just part of the natural process of reproduction. | |