New to the forum? Sign Up Here! Already a member? Please login below.
|
|||||
|
||
|
Although I don't agree that the higher FSH is a direct predictor of egg quality, it is indicative that there will be a problem with the number of eggs and that will directly effect pregnancy outcome. As far as switching protocols goes, I'm not the one to ask. Try Dr Jacob's Infertility 101 Mesage Board - he's an RE, I'm not. |
||
|
||
|
Thank you for your input regarding this. Very helpful. I do have another question. The Dr. mentioned that the egg quality was poor, based on the FSH and that they had to use ICSI to fertilize. He mentioned that the outer surface of the egg was unable to be penetrated by the sperm. Dr. Jacobs said this was most likely a sperm issue, but the Dr. here believes it is an egg issue. Any thoughts? |
||
|
||
|
It could be both or either. Everybody's right here. If the protein coat that surrounds the egg (zona pellucida) is particularly thick, sperm may have difficulty penetrating. Conversly, if the protein coat is a normal thickness, and the sperm have to have sufficient "drive" to penetrate the protein coat, fertilization rates are diminished. In either of these cases, ICSI is a better choice. |
||
|
||
|
Hello, |
||
|
||
|
The 12-cell embryo was a little ahead of the game, but nothing to worry about. I cannot predict your chances of pregnancy from the cell number of the embryos (specially without a grade). Also, I have no idea about the skill of the physician transferring the embryos (great embryos + botched transfer = failed cycle). I'm afraid you'll just have to wait and see. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Try not to get too stressed out (although that's prabably impossible). Best of luck. |
||
|
||
|
Thank you for answering my question about the 12 cell embryo. I do know the hospital I went to has the best lab in my area. So, as you said we will just have to wait and see what happens. |
||